David Hector Thibodeau MLIS MBA

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 21 April 2010

Georgia Power and Dynamic Pricing

Posted on 16:55 by Unknown
Perfect price discrimination relies upon individual consumers paying the maximum price they are willing to pay for the goods or services they receive. Dynamic pricing is “pricing that changes when the demand for something increases or decreases”, (dynamic pricing, 2006). Dynamic pricing can be a form of perfect price discrimination, often referred to as first-degree price discrimination, if it occurs when companies charge differing amounts for the same service, especially when using a model that considers the time of demand of consumption.

Jeffrey Perloff maintains that in order for a firm to perfectly price discriminate they must determine what an individual consumer’s reservation price is, (the maximum amount they are willing to pay), and they must have considerable information about their customers, (2007, p. 118). Electrical utilities operate as monopolies in most states and therefore have a tremendous amount of market power; however the prices that they can charge customers are regulated by the states in which they operate. Georgia Power, the electricity utility for the state of Georgia, has been successfully using a dynamic pricing model for industrial customers for almost twenty years. In order to charge different amounts they must determine when an industrial customer is using electricity during peak usage times. In order to determine this they installed “smart meters” which record hourly usage for industrial customers.

Georgia Power’s program is a two-part fee based program with standard rates for baseline consumption and hourly market rates added to this fee for consumption above this baseline amount, (Kosavanic & Engel, 2004). There have been significant benefits to Georgia Power and its industrial customers as wholesale market prices, which vary hourly, have dropped 17% since the meters were installed, (Colledge, Hicks, Robb, & Wagle, 2002). Industrial customers of Georgia Power can voluntarily shut down or scale back operations during peak billing periods, without affecting their overall output, by monitoring their usage during these peak-periods.

Recently there is evidence that Georgia Power intends to extend a dynamic pricing model to residential customers as well. Currently residential customers in Georgia can agree to allow Georgia Power to install a switch on their houses that is connected to their HVAC units in exchange for an initial $20.00 credit. During peak electricity use periods in the summer months Georgia Power will be able to send a signal to this switch limiting the amount of time air conditioning units will run. Each time that the power company flips this switch, consumers receive an additional $2.00 credit. Additionally Georgia Power began replacing traditional electricity meters with “smart meters” in January of 2008 on residences with the intention of enabling consumers in the future to manage their energy usage and control their own bills, (Southern Company, 2010).

While a dynamic pricing model for industrial consumption may benefit both Georgia Power and the industries that utilize this model, it remains to be seen that this model will benefit residential consumers. Unless specific provisions are made for those consumers with limited incomes, especially the elderly, the infirm, and the disabled, during the summer months these patrons could be forced to make difficult choices between utilizing medical equipment or the necessary operation of air conditioning units and paying increased electric bills. Additionally, oppressive summer heat could force residents who can no longer afford their power bills from their homes into the streets.


References:

Colledge, J., Hicks, J., Robb, J., & Wagle, D. (2002). Power by the minute. Power Economics , 2002(1), 73-81. Retrieved from EBSCOhost Business Source Premier.

Dynamic pricing. (2006). Dictionary of Business. Retrieved from http://www.credoreference.com/entry/acbbusiness/dynamic_pricing

Kosavanic, L. & Engel, D. (2004, May). Meeting the nation’s demand for power: a new take on demand programs. Energy User News, 29(5), 11-14. Retrieved from EBSCOhost
Business Source Premier.

Perloff, J. M. (2007). Microeconomics (4th ed.). New York: Pearson Addison Wesley.
Southern Company. (2010). Your meter is about to get smarter. Retrieved from http://www.georgiapower.com/residential/smartmeter.asp
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Leadership in action - high LPC vs low LPC leadership
    According to Fiedler’s 1967 theory of the Contingency Model of Leadership, leader’s fall into different leadership styles based upon a scale...
  • Organizational Culture in Mergers & Acquisitions
    In today’s volatile economy it is more important than ever for a firm to be able to strategically and tactically manage its resources effect...
  • Sustainable electronic serials collection
    Following is an evaluation of a sustainable electronic serials collections project that I undertook to free a suitable amount of extra space...
  • Some Thoughts on Medicaid Expansion for Business
    According to the Kaiser Family Foundation twenty one states are not moving forward with Medicaid expansion either due to their governor’s op...
  • Authentic Leadership vs. Charismatic Leadership
    Authentic leaders have strong values and a sense of purpose, and rather than trying to be all things to all people, concentrate on providing...
  • Greenfield Initiative: Bulgaria vs. Panama
    As opposed to an acquisition, a Greenfield initiative requires a different set of parameters when selecting a country for expansion. Compani...
  • Changing to participatory leadership
    Implementation Model: Lewin’s Force Field Theory: 3 step process to increase the forces for, or decrease the resistance to change. 1. Unfree...
  • FOREX
    Converting €1 million at an exchange rate of €.70 to $1.00 would mean that you had $1,430,000.00: If 1.0 dollars = .70 euros, then 1 euro= 1...
  • Mergers and Acquisitions
    A merger is generally considered a friendlier strategy than other types of acquisitions. In a true merger of equals, the interests of both ...
  • Economic Structure of OPEC
    An oligopoly represents an intermediate market between a perfectly competitive market and a monopoly. Whereas perfectly competitive markets ...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (1)
    • ►  June (1)
  • ►  2011 (6)
    • ►  March (6)
  • ▼  2010 (40)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  July (12)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ▼  April (18)
      • Formal Research vs. Business Proposal
      • FOREX
      • Coca-Cola Company
      • Trade Economics (brief discussion)
      • Colombia FTA
      • Chiquita Brands International
      • Globalization vs. Protectionism
      • Economic Structure of OPEC
      • Georgia Power and Dynamic Pricing
      • Georgia: Peanuts vs. Cotton
      • Microeconomics Macroeconomics and Property Crime
      • Twiname Article Review
      • Organizational Culture in Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Trust, Empowerment, and Training Initiatives
      • Rogue Librarians
      • Gain on Sale Accounting
      • Employee Empowerment and Productivity: Issues of T...
      • Optimal Resume at AMERICAN INTERCONTINENTAL UNIVER...
  • ►  2008 (1)
    • ►  January (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile